دیدگاه‌ها برای اقتصاد خودمونی http://roozbehmn.wordpress.com Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:12:25 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 دیدگاه‌ها برای حذف یارانه، توزیع نقدی و ایده‌ای برای پژوهش با f . m . f http://roozbehmn.wordpress.com/2008/04/07/%d8%ad%d8%b0%d9%81-%db%8c%d8%a7%d8%b1%d8%a7%d9%86%d9%87%d8%8c-%d8%aa%d9%88%d8%b2%db%8c%d8%b9-%d9%86%d9%82%d8%af%db%8c-%d9%88-%d8%a7%db%8c%d8%af%d9%87%e2%80%8c%d8%a7%db%8c-%d8%a8%d8%b1%d8%a7%db%8c/#comment-79 f . m . f Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:12:25 +0000 http://roozbehmn.wordpress.com/?p=9#comment-79 اگر اقای احمدنژاد با حقوق 200000 تومان حقوق ماهیانه اش باشد می تواند زندگی را بچرخاند لطفاً بهش بگویید روی رسانه ها اقای محمود احمد نژاد کار ریس جمهوری را خوب نمی دانی مردم را تو باتلاق نگذار که همه بمبرند با تشکر بنده خدا اگر اقای احمدنژاد با حقوق 200000 تومان حقوق ماهیانه اش باشد می تواند زندگی را بچرخاند
لطفاً بهش بگویید روی رسانه ها
اقای محمود احمد نژاد کار ریس جمهوری را خوب نمی دانی مردم را تو باتلاق
نگذار که همه بمبرند
با تشکر بنده خدا

]]> دیدگاه‌ها برای حذف یارانه، توزیع نقدی و ایده‌ای برای پژوهش با كمپ 220 دانشگاه اوز http://roozbehmn.wordpress.com/2008/04/07/%d8%ad%d8%b0%d9%81-%db%8c%d8%a7%d8%b1%d8%a7%d9%86%d9%87%d8%8c-%d8%aa%d9%88%d8%b2%db%8c%d8%b9-%d9%86%d9%82%d8%af%db%8c-%d9%88-%d8%a7%db%8c%d8%af%d9%87%e2%80%8c%d8%a7%db%8c-%d8%a8%d8%b1%d8%a7%db%8c/#comment-78 كمپ 220 دانشگاه اوز Wed, 21 Oct 2009 07:47:21 +0000 http://roozbehmn.wordpress.com/?p=9#comment-78 آهاي مردم, ميدونيد مصرف سرانه ي ما چقدره؟ ايا ميدونيد كه مصرف سرانه ي انرژي در اروپا 960 كيلو واته ولي در ايران حدود 1250 كيلو واته؟ حذف يارانه به اقتصائ ما كمك بزرگي ميكنه. آهاي مردم, ميدونيد مصرف سرانه ي ما چقدره؟ ايا ميدونيد كه مصرف سرانه ي انرژي در اروپا 960 كيلو واته ولي در ايران حدود 1250 كيلو واته؟ حذف يارانه به اقتصائ ما كمك بزرگي ميكنه.

]]> دیدگاه‌ها برای تئوری اقتصاد و بحران مالی با faculty of economics http://roozbehmn.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/maskin-on-crises/#comment-77 faculty of economics Sun, 18 Oct 2009 09:13:10 +0000 http://roozbehmn.wordpress.com/?p=75#comment-77 سلام استاد ارجمند . امیدوارم ایام به کامتان باشد . من یک پروژه حساس و مهم سرنوشت ساز دارم . اگر امکانش برای شما وجود دارد در خصوص موضوع زیر من را راهنمایی بفرمایید . (معرفی منابع ، مقالات زیبا ، دیدگاه خودتان ) بازار سرمایه ایران (بورس) در قالب : سابقه ، عملکرد ، پیش بینی صمیمانه از کمک شما متشکرم . سلام استاد ارجمند . امیدوارم ایام به کامتان باشد . من یک پروژه حساس و مهم سرنوشت ساز دارم . اگر امکانش برای شما وجود دارد در خصوص موضوع زیر من را راهنمایی بفرمایید . (معرفی منابع ، مقالات زیبا ، دیدگاه خودتان )
بازار سرمایه ایران (بورس) در قالب : سابقه ، عملکرد ، پیش بینی

صمیمانه از کمک شما متشکرم .

]]> دیدگاه‌ها برای تئوری اقتصاد و بحران مالی با Pouyan http://roozbehmn.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/maskin-on-crises/#comment-76 Pouyan Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:21:44 +0000 http://roozbehmn.wordpress.com/?p=75#comment-76 I did not say Economics is of no use. I do not know how you got to that conclusion. I just said (you also pointed out) the financial regulation was overlooked by majority of them. The other story is many of them were unaware of the crisis or even overlooked its signs. One example is the paper you mentioned which was answered here: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1294766 I did not say Economics is of no use. I do not know how you got to that conclusion. I just said (you also pointed out) the financial regulation was overlooked by majority of them. The other story is
many of them were unaware of the crisis or even overlooked its signs. One example is the paper you mentioned which was answered here:
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1294766

]]> دیدگاه‌ها برای تئوری اقتصاد و بحران مالی با روزبه http://roozbehmn.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/maskin-on-crises/#comment-75 روزبه Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:03:31 +0000 http://roozbehmn.wordpress.com/?p=75#comment-75 پویان به جای جروبحث کردن با من مقاله رو بخون http://www.minneapolisfed.org/research/WP/WP666.pdf این ها آمارهاییه که در زمان نوشتن این مقاله در دسترس بوده و منتشر شده بوده. حرفی که تو میزنی منافاتی با حرف من نداره. نکته مهم اینه که خیلی از اقتصاددونها بر مینی کار تئوریکشون میدونستن که این رگولیشن ها باید باشه. ولی متاسفانه هم سیاست‌گزاران و هم اکثر اقتصاددونها به این بی توجهی کردند. این خیلی فرق می‌کنه با اینکه بگی اقتصاددونها هیچی از این ماجرا نمی‌دونستند و اصلا اقتصاد به چه درد می‌خوره و... و... و پویان
به جای جروبحث کردن با من مقاله رو بخون
http://www.minneapolisfed.org/research/WP/WP666.pdf
این ها آمارهاییه که در زمان نوشتن این مقاله در دسترس بوده و منتشر شده بوده.

حرفی که تو میزنی منافاتی با حرف من نداره. نکته مهم اینه که خیلی از اقتصاددونها بر مینی کار تئوریکشون میدونستن که این رگولیشن ها باید باشه. ولی متاسفانه هم سیاست‌گزاران و هم اکثر اقتصاددونها به این بی توجهی کردند.
این خیلی فرق می‌کنه با اینکه بگی اقتصاددونها هیچی از این ماجرا نمی‌دونستند و اصلا اقتصاد به چه درد می‌خوره و… و… و

]]> دیدگاه‌ها برای تئوری اقتصاد و بحران مالی با Pouyan http://roozbehmn.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/maskin-on-crises/#comment-74 Pouyan Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:29:27 +0000 http://roozbehmn.wordpress.com/?p=75#comment-74 i.e number 3 CP rate was up and it is market was almost dried last year The claim was clearly otherwise I said lack of belief in sth not disbelief in sth. Financial regulation has been loose in the US b/c many people think deregulation is good for all industries including finaincials. i.e number 3
CP rate was up and it is market was almost dried last year
The claim was clearly otherwise

I said lack of belief in sth not disbelief in sth. Financial regulation has been loose in the US b/c many people think deregulation is good for all industries including finaincials.

]]> دیدگاه‌ها برای تئوری اقتصاد و بحران مالی با روزبه http://roozbehmn.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/maskin-on-crises/#comment-73 روزبه Thu, 15 Oct 2009 16:11:25 +0000 http://roozbehmn.wordpress.com/?p=75#comment-73 Pouyan They back up their claim by official data from the Fed what do you mean number 2 and 3 were not correct. It is data. There is no analysis there You might say that they were looking at the wrong (or incomplete) data. Or you might say this is not the whole story. But you can't just deny those facts in the data. That is what they did. They reported facts. About regulatory and academia. There has been many papers that call for regulatory supervision. Read Holmstrom and Tirole. Or Fostal and Geanakopolos. Both were saying there should be supervision on leverage. So at least some people in academia knew what needs to be done based on theoretical work. The question why their message was not heard.  Pouyan
They back up their claim by official data from the Fed what do you mean number 2 and 3 were not correct. It is data. There is no analysis there
You might say that they were looking at the wrong (or incomplete) data. Or you might say this is not the whole story. But you can’t just deny those facts in the data. That is what they did. They reported facts.
About regulatory and academia. There has been many papers that call for regulatory supervision. Read Holmstrom and Tirole. Or Fostal and Geanakopolos. Both were saying there should be supervision on leverage.
So at least some people in academia knew what needs to be done based on theoretical work. The question why their message was not heard. 

]]> دیدگاه‌ها برای تئوری اقتصاد و بحران مالی با Pouyan http://roozbehmn.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/maskin-on-crises/#comment-72 Pouyan Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:31:02 +0000 http://roozbehmn.wordpress.com/?p=75#comment-72 Refering to the bullet points of your post on their paper. Numbers 2 and 3 were not correct. Illiquidity has been pointed out by Maskin as well. Lack of belief in financial regulation and overlooking illiquidity have been the weak points of academia in detecting the crisis.That was the reason the crisis came as a surprise last year. Refering to the bullet points of your post on their paper. Numbers 2 and 3 were not correct.
Illiquidity has been pointed out by Maskin as well. Lack of belief in financial regulation and overlooking illiquidity have been the weak points of academia in detecting the crisis.That was the reason the crisis came as a surprise last year.

]]> دیدگاه‌ها برای تئوری اقتصاد و بحران مالی با روزبه http://roozbehmn.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/maskin-on-crises/#comment-71 روزبه Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:59:58 +0000 http://roozbehmn.wordpress.com/?p=75#comment-71 Pouyan Did you even read their (Kehoe et al) paper? They never said the crises itself is a myth. They pointed out some myth about it. Their paper was an attempt to clarify were the facts about the crises. Pouyan
Did you even read their (Kehoe et al) paper? They never said the crises itself is a myth. They pointed out some myth about it. Their paper was an attempt to clarify were the facts about the crises.

]]> دیدگاه‌ها برای تئوری اقتصاد و بحران مالی با Pouyan http://roozbehmn.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/maskin-on-crises/#comment-70 Pouyan Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:53:39 +0000 http://roozbehmn.wordpress.com/?p=75#comment-70 Especially the economists like Kehoe et. al. who were saying last October that the credit crisis was a myth. Especially the economists like Kehoe et. al. who were saying last October that the credit crisis was a myth.

]]>